Balls as Chairs

Home Forums General Ergonomics Topics Balls as Chairs

This topic contains 22 replies, has 17 voices, and was last updated by  dale 5 years ago.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 23 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #37441

    budnick
    Participant

    I just participated in an extended discussion about “ball chairs”, and I’m interested to learn what others think about this subject. As some background, you might want to read what has become one of the most consistently read articles in our Ergonomics Today(TM) news service, “Opinion: Balls as Office Chairs a Bad Idea”

    (http://www.ergoweb.com/news/detail.cfm?id=1091), which is a summary of discussions that took place here, in the Ergoweb Forum.

    Here are some questions to consider.

    In your experience:

    1. Are “ball chairs” becoming more common in the workplace?

    2. If so, are more employers actually purchasing them for employees, or are employees bringing the balls to work on their own?

    3. Have you heard of any related mishaps occurring either in schools or in offices (e.g., people falling off the ball, balls rupturing, etc.)?

    4. Do you consider the ball to be a replacement for an ergonomic office chair?

    Best regards,

    #42976

    SchultzDavidR
    Participant

    We have had some inquiries from employees about bringing them into the workplace, but will not allow them and most of this is based on previous discussions in this forum, plus other information.

    #42979

    peter.goyert
    Participant

    All good questions. This topic that is receiving lot of attention and from our experience, employers are reluctant to purchase these for workers. It is generally the worker, often an injured one, that is looking to their employer to purchase one for them. I have attached an article from a WorkSafeBC publication that outlines our position on this.

    Peter Goyert CCPE

    Senior Ergonomist

    WorkSafeBC

    peter.goyert@worksafebc.com

    (604) 279-7472

    #42982

    peter.goyert
    Participant

    Attached is the copy of article referenced above.

    Peter Goyert

    Senior Ergonomist

    WorkSafeBC

    peter.goyert@worksafebc.com

    (604) 279-7472

    #42984

    mwh001
    Participant

    I have observed office workers using these, and for the most part, ends up being worse than even the worst office chair. Workers often tend to think that the seating choice absolutely makes the workstation and that the physioball will facilitate better posture. According to observation, however, the ball is worse because it offers no lumbar support and people end up with hyper-kyphotic postures due to paraspinal muscle fatigue and posterior pelvic tilt. I think that these balls can be good for a variety of exercises, and maybe used for short periods throughout the day to help with core muscle strengthening, but not as a primary choice in office seating.

    Mark Hank

    #42989

    budauj
    Participant

    At my work place we don’t allow them for safety reasons (falliing off) as well as lack of evidence they do any good (and growing evidence they don’t). No real problems yet, but there have been two hard pushes by employees who have had personal experiences with their home office that they saw as very positive. So far though we have been able to hold the line and no exercise balls outside of our fitness rooms.

    Jeff Budau, CEA

    #42990

    jamurphy
    Participant

    I appreciate the article from Peter Goyert, Senior Ergonomist at WorkSafeBC on why not to use fitness balls in the workplace. I’m going to send it to our HR director and wellness program coordinator once again, to warn them of the dangers of using the Swiss balls in the workplace. Unfortunately, we offer these balls to our employees. They pay for them but our wellness person orders them. She also provide a basic introduction to exercises that can be done on them. I have not supported using these balls from the first mention of the idea, but the wellness person likes them and ignores the risks. I haven’t heard of anyone falling off the ball and getting injured but I have consulted with workers who developed back pain that is caused or exacerbated by prolonged sitting on the balls without back support and awkward twisting to reach other areas of their desk. Luckily our tech dept, who are the main users of the balls, recently moved into smaller cubicles that make it more difficult to use the balls.

    #42992

    Tamalaine
    Participant

    I consult part-time for a mid-sized company in the SF Bay Area (1500 employees) and we recommend fitness balls for some people. Actually, we give one to anybody that asks to try one. We are picky about what balls are used. We order and supply anti-burst balls from Body Trends (www.bodytrends.com) and we haven’t had one burst yet. There are various different sizes of balls and the website has sizing charts, but basically, for shorter people, we use the 55 cm ball, for mid-height people we use the 65 cm ball, and for tall people we use the 75 cm ball. The Maxafe ball comes in a lot of sizes. The ball should be inflated until it is quite firm, but there is a fair amount of leeway for adjusting the inflation so the height is correct for the individual. As with any seating, inflation should be adjusted so that the person sits with their feet comfortably on the floor and in an upright posture.

    Use of a fitness ball for seating is good for people who slump because it tends to force them to sit up straight. Also, it’s great as an active seating solution. The requirement for constant balancing means you can’t sit still, and it’s fun to sit on, so encourages bouncing!

    With that said, however, we do not recommend this to be the only seating available. Most people have fairly weak back muscles, so sitting on a ball without any back support is very tiring at first. We recommend that people start with 1/2 hour and gradually work up as their back muscles get stronger. We have found that people are generally pretty good judges of when their backs are tired and it’s time to move back to a chair with back support.

    If a person needs to move around a lot, for instance moving from the computer to an adjacent file cabinet, the ball is a problem. It’s not easy to navigate on a ball, so it’s really best for people who sit at a computer for hours each day. We have not had any mishaps or accidents with people falling in the 3 or 4 years we have been using balls in the offices.

    Finally, I do not recommend the balls that come on frames with wheels and backrests. The backrests are not adjustable, the balls only come in one size, and it defeats the purpose of sitting on the ball to encourage balancing and active seating.

    Be advised that this is coming from someone (me) who sells ergonomic seating (Neutral Posture and Office Master)! I am obviously a great believer in good ergonomic chairs, but they do not tend to encourage active sitting the way a ball does. (Yes, I’m one of those evil people who consults and sells products. In a rural area, it’s the only way to get great products.)

    Tamara Mitchell

    Have A Nice Fit Ergonomics

    http://www.nice-fit.com

    #42991

    ttilbury
    Participant

    Use of a fitness ball for seating is good for people who slump because it tends to force them to sit up straight. Also, it’s great as an active seating solution. The requirement for constant balancing means you can’t sit still, and it’s fun to sit on, so encourages bouncing!

    With that said, however, we do not recommend this to be the only seating available. Most people have fairly weak back muscles, so sitting on a ball without any back support is very tiring at first. We recommend that people start with 1/2 hour and gradually work up as their back muscles get stronger. We have found that people are generally pretty good judges of when their backs are tired and it’s time to move back to a chair with back support.

    We have not had any mishaps or accidents with people falling in the 3 or 4 years we have been using balls in the offices.

    Tamara Mitchell

    Have A Nice Fit Ergonomics

    http://www.nice-fit.com

    Hi Tamara,

    From what you’re saying, you must be using one yourself as you are making some fairly positive endorsements! For those of us who are ‘evidence based’ and also look at how these balls meet the purpose of allowing people to interact safely and comfortably with a computer, monitor and keyboard, I think that there are issues you haven’t covered.

    My concern with adapting any of these exercise products or even stretching programs for whole populations is that there is no apparent concern for who may be at risk of injury. I guess that being a health professional, we are influenced by the one line of the Hippocratic oath “I will prescribe regimen for the good of my patients according to my ability and my judgement and never do harm to anyone”.

    With the balls, I agree that some of the working population will benefit – which it appears you have found in your consultancy. I also agree that the population who are likely to benefit are those who are very young (under 30), have no pre-existing conditions, and are only doing computer based tasks. And although I fully agree that we do have a problem with people sitting all day because of the lack of dynamic activity, I believe that activity should be built into daily tasks rather than relying on a ball as a chair. If we want to incorporate regular daily exercise for working populations, there are other ways to do it under more controlled condtions.

    My other concerns:

    The focus on the ball is only what is happening at the low back – what is really happening to the thoracic and cervical spine without back support for 8+ hours? Yes, multifidus and some of the other core musculature are firing with the instability brought about by the ball, but they do not extend the whole length of the spine.

    Balls come in 5 cm increments – is this adequate for the anthropometrics of the user population?

    The biggest advocates of these balls appear to be from exercise backgrounds, who generally (due to my review of course curricula) have limited training in pathology and effects of aging/injury on the spine and musculature of the spine. I have yet to see good studies in situ of what happens to scapular stabilisers, cervical musculature, etc, when using the balls and keying at the same time – or studies where representative samples of age groups in the working population have been undertaken based on stringent research methodology. In other words, would this promotion of balls as chairs hold up to a Cochrane review when some ergo studies haven’t?

    The line about it ‘forcing them to sit up straight’ is one that the majority of proponents will use – but is that borne out during the whole day, or as the muscles fatigue (especially with 10-12 hour days) does posture change?

    So, in conclusion, the evidence coming from studies done on use of sit stand tables, forearm supports etc outweighs what I could find for the evidence supporting balls as chairs for large populations. There may be subsectors of the population that will benefit (and not be harmed) but as ergonomists I feel we need to be rigorous in our ability to look at evidence and knowledge when making recommendations.

    #42993

    Tamalaine
    Participant

    Maybe you missed my point that I don’t recommend the balls for a full day?

    I do agree that working for 8 hours at a computer is less that optimal, but in reality, that is what a huge number of people are asked to do at their jobs. We encourage breaks, standing while talking on the phone, etc. But active seating is a very good approach to improving circulation and preventing injury.

    The ergonomics program where I consult started out cautiously with the ball 3 or 4 years ago, just giving them to a few people. Many people found them to be very beneficial, so we started using them more. The population at this company is not generally young people.

    So far, the people speaking out loudest against the fitness balls seem to be people paid by the chair companies to badmouth them. I have hopes that we will eventually see some real unbiased research on this topic, but as you point out, it will need to be longitudinal and conditions will need to be highly controlled.

    Balls will never replace chairs, but they can be a very healthy supplement.

    #42994

    pgchiro
    Participant

    I have used the gym ball as a rehab tool for over 10 years in that time have had several patients use them as a chair in the office and at home. I have had no recorded incidence of a patient falling off the ball. The results of patients using the ball as a chair have been positive.

    #42995

    ttilbury
    Participant

    Hi Tamara,

    Yes, I missed where you said the balls were not used for full days. I saw where you start them off for 1/2 hour, and let them judge when they moved back to a regular chair, but I wasn’t clear on if this was part of a graduated move towards use of the ball all day.

    With your comment, and that of pgchiro, I can see that there would be divergence of recommendations of the ball as a chair based on whether you were a consultant/health practitioner/fitness practitioner vs. internal health and safety manager for the company. As I have been both a consultant and an internal OHS advisor, I can say that the decisions are made from very different perspectives. That was part of the point of my previous posting.

    From an internal company perspective (or even sometimes a gov’t regulatory perspective) you have to consider liability, evidence, and risk management of all health and safety issues, managing ‘expectations’ of the staff, as well as assisting supervisors manage the inevitable use and abuse of any program. As a consultant, you will usually have a very good idea of the positive benefits of the intervention, but won’t have to deal with the day to day issues – or complaints.

    I want to make it clear that when I was an OHS advisor we had a number of staff who used the ball – but it was always seen as part of a rehabilitation program (or prevention program) with a specific plan for it’s use. We also had a number of them in the ‘break out’ areas for staff who wanted to use them on breaks, or if they wanted to try them out. We lent them to staff as well to use at home- again only once they had been assessed and were clear on how to use them. I think that once the company reviewed it’s liability, they weren’t lent to staff unless our physio had found they needed to do home exercises, or build their tolerance. As you can see, we had a very proactive approach for early intervention and the organisation has continued to provide on site physio, exercise rooms for meditation, tai chi, yoga etc (no gym) as well as access to a number of discounted health programs. The use of the balls was seen as part of an overall plan of matching the needs of the person to the activity that suited them and their lifestyle – hmmn sounds like ergonomics doesn’t it?

    I can’t comment on the statement that the main detractors of the ball were chair manufacturers- mainly because I think most ergonomists should be able to review the appropriateness of the intervention and see through the salesmen and rhetoric. But as I’ve stated in previous posts, I have very high expectations of ergonomists.

    #42988

    jamurphy
    Participant

    Swiss ‘therapy’ balls were developed as a therapeutic modality, to be used in gyms under the guidance of a therapist or as part of a home exercise program. The ultimate goal is to improve core strength to where the person can stabilize their back and pelvis at all times and with all activities. A person shouldn’t exercise on the ball for part of the day and then walk, shop, vacuum, do dishes etc with poor stabilization. The ball is like training wheels on a bike that are eventually removed when balance and strength are achieved and can be maintained. If people want to use the ball for ongoing strengthening, why not do it at home while watching TV, or while at the gym? The ball wasn’t designed for doing prolonged desktop work with arms extended in front. An hour/day on the ball at work may be too much. If people don’t use the ball at therapy or home for 1 or 2 hours at a time, why should they do it at work? I’m beginning to view the use of swiss balls in the workplace as another a symptom of our frenetic, multitasking lifestyles.

    Regarding balls failing or popping… I have heard of instances in which the ball popped… or rather exploded, while a pt was exercising on it. It’s a good thing they were in a gym where they weren’t severely hurt when they fell. If they had been in an office, they could easily fall against any of the sharp edges, desks, file cabinets etc surrounding them.

    #42998

    mwh001
    Participant

    Tamara,

    I’m confused by your comment that the balls help workers to sit up straighter. In my observations, people tend to slump forward more often while sitting on a therapy ball. The reason, I think, and I do not have any studies to back this, but as the paraspinal muscles fatigue, the user will increase thoracic flexion, the pelvis will roll into posterior tilt, and the person ends up in a slumped posture with kyphotic lumbar and hyperkyphotic thoracic spine segments.

    I agree that these balls can be a good tool for exercise and core strengthening, but not as a primary seating choice. I think that changing postures is best encouraged by using sit to stand workstations for people who are bound by call center work or otherwise do not have an opportunity to vary their tasks by attending meetings, or doing other little tasks away from the computer.

    Mark Hank, OTR/L, CEA

    #42999

    maxhely
    Participant

    For

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 23 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.